instead of storing all sync items underneath the AEROGEAR instance, we
could have a AGDATASYNC JIRA instance. I think this makes it nicer to
organize, especially with releases. That's what we did with AGPUSH for the
'push feature', which obviously is available across platforms.
-Matthias
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi All,
we have created JIRA tasks for the data sync roadmaps [1][2].
While creating them we noticed that we are using different component names
in JIRA for the our projects:
AEROGEAR:
Uses 'data-sync' as the component name:
https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?filter=12322676
AGIOS
Uses 'sync' as the component name:
https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?filter=12322678
AGDROID
Uses 'datasync' as the component name:
https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?filter=12322677
AGJS
Uses 'data-sync' as the component name:
https://issues.jboss.org/issues/?filter=12322679
I would be nice to makes these consistent across the projects. Let me know
which you prefer and I'll make the changes needed.
I'm personally +1 for 'datasync'
[1]
http://aerogear.org/docs/planning/roadmaps/AeroGearDataSync
[2]
http://aerogear.org/docs/planning/roadmaps/AeroGearConflictResolution
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf