On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
Do we have a good reason to use Spock instead of conventional tools
in
Java? Something that only spock can solve?
Our tests can be written in Java? Maybe I missed the point, but have a
project based in personal taste doesn't make sense to me.
I would love to write my tests with rspec and JRuby, which doesn't mean
I will start to do it.
good point
Corinne Krych wrote:
> Don't focus on Groovy (if it makes you sad), emphasis is on Spock!
>
> #HappyPuppy :)
>
> ++
> Corinne
> On Jul 14, 2013, at 4:34 AM, Douglas Campos<qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 06:21:34PM +0200, Karel Piwko wrote:
>>> I have evaluated multiple API approaches, described here[3], Groovy
and Spock
>>> seems to be the best to me.
>> And now I regret badly having missed the word "Groovy" between the
>> provided options when I've gone to review the push server codebase.
>>
>> #sadpanda :(
>>
>> --
>> qmx
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
abstractj
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf