8:22 a.m.
+1
But what we could think about in terms of "integration" is for instance :
- Making a Unified Push Instance "discoverable" by RHQ
- Making a Application that is using the Unified Sender "discoverable" by
RHQ : to be able to configure Push Configuration from a central place (RHQ
plugin ...)
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org>wrote:
> I couldn't agree more with you Dan and I think that "Camel &
Friends"
> was supposed to be done by the team responsible for it, in other worlds
> Camel team.
>
> To me is clear as crystal that our job is to improve the experience with
> mobile like we did with SimplePush, UnifiedPush...etc.
>
yeah, same feelings here;
I think the integration with "Camel & Friends" came up, during the
Face2Face, when looking for UP/SP integration w/ the controller
(I guess that's when Camel integration for the controller came up as well
(or was shown)
-M
>
> We are not an integration platform as far as I know. (I can be wrong)
>
> > Daniel Bevenius <mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
> > September 12, 2013 2:30 AM
> > >Think "Apache Camel & friends"
> > Are we still talking about a "Mobil Gateway" [1] and to have a
"no
> > code" solution for developers to use?
> >
> > I've been looking at this previously, and I'm having a hard time to
> > understand who would really use something like this for anything
> > except a simple demo. It would be a different matter if we were going
> > to provided BaaS (Backend as a Service) as we would have more control
> > of the backend and could add features in a reliable way (paging,
> > security etc). If our Mobil Gateway is simply acting as a intercepting
> > proxy it would be more complicated to add such features, and this
> > added complexity might introduce other issue with regard to
> > connectivity and performance.
> >
> > If our goal is to enable enterprise services to be exposed to mobile
> > devices then I think the simplest option for me would be to add a
> > RESTFul interface to those services. This can already be done with
> > Camel, SwitchYard, Vert.x, or by using RestEasy. I would think that a
> > developer tasked with this would want to follow "normal" development
> > practises, using standard development tools, testing, deployment model
> > etc, and not use a web interface perform these task. We could provide
> > all that via the GUI, but my guess would be that developers would
> > choose the standard way just the same.
> >
> > [1] https://gist.github.com/danbev/717759ef7a445c626f25
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > Corinne Krych <mailto:corinnekrych@gmail.com>
> > September 11, 2013 11:50 AM
> > EIP
> >
> > to stay cryptic :)
> >
> > Thanks Doug for this light.
> >
> > ++
> > Corinne
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > Douglas Campos <mailto:qmx@qmx.me>
> > September 11, 2013 11:40 AM
> >
> > Think "Apache Camel & friends" :P
> >
> > Sebastien Blanc <mailto:scm.blanc@gmail.com>
> > September 10, 2013 3:48 AM
> > What does the "integration functionality" exactly stands for ?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > Douglas Campos <mailto:qmx@qmx.me>
> > September 10, 2013 2:01 AM
> > Howdy!
> >
> > According to yesterday's team meeting, we need to update our Grand
> > RoadMap[1].
> >
> > Things to note:
> >
> > - We know the schedule will slip, because push - we just need to
> > estimate accordingly.
> > - IMHO Security will need a little bit more room than the aggressive
> > 6-week cycle - my shoot is 8-week minimum.
> > - What about the showcase app? Does it have more priority than the
> > "integration functionality?"
> > - Offline/Sync: To do it together or not, that's the question!
> >
> > Let's discuss this RoadMap during this week so we can just agree on the
> > outcome at our next team's meeting, **next monday**. I know timing is
> > tight but Jay needs this...
> >
> > Thanks y'all!
> >
> > [1]:
>
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/blob/master/docs/scratchpad/Aero...
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> --
> abstractj
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev