Re: [aerogear-dev] Java Sender API - fire&forget - adding callback methods?
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:23:25 +0200
Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Callback do not make to much sense for the java implementation IMO
(maybe
for the Node implementation it makes more sense) but for the Java
Implementation of the Sender we could discuss on :
I think callback makes sense even if its synchronous, especially if Sender API
is synchronous as well.
- returning the http status code rather than returning void
How useful is returning a status response without response body?
- have a better exception handling and introduce a Sender specific Exception
+1
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I went once again through
> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/2013-June/002901.html -
> which
> says that Sender API should be fire&forget. It feels more like "maybe
> fire"&forget, for instance it does not say that your credentials were
> wrong - or
> it says, you need parse logs to get that information.
>
> If I think about Android, iOS, JS solutions to communicate with
> UnifiedPush we provide - Pipes - they always provide a callback to be
> executed
> on success/failure. Could we add callback to Sender API? Or should not
> Aerogear
> rather have something like Pipes abstraction for Java developers instead of
> pretty dumb Sender API?
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Karel
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>