Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS Node Sender client categories issue?

Thanks Luke! You guys are awesome! -Miles From: Luke Holmquist <lholmqui@redhat.com<mailto:lholmqui@redhat.com>> Reply-To: AeroGear Developer Mailing List <aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>> Date: Thursday, July 16, 2015 at 9:09 AM To: AeroGear Developer Mailing List <aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>> Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS Node Sender client categories issue? This should be all set now, i released 0.7.1 on npm and here is the release on GH, https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-nodejs-client/releases/t... On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui@redhat.com<mailto:lholmqui@redhat.com>> wrote: So i've sent PR's for this now, https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-nodejs-client/pull/21 and https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-nodejs-client/pull/20 first link is for the 0.7.x release and second is for master On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui@redhat.com<mailto:lholmqui@redhat.com>> wrote: On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org<mailto:matzew@apache.org>> wrote: On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui@redhat.com<mailto:lholmqui@redhat.com>> wrote: JIRA'd https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1468 Matzew, so for versioning of the node-sender, i wonder if we should add that "component" in the versions for JIRA similar to how sps has it's own versioning scheme. something like node-sender-0.7.0 , node-sender-0.8.0 ? something like that, would be easier to keep track of those releases. as i was writing this, i'm also thinking if these issues should be part of AG-JS and i can do the versions there? hmmm yeah - actually, I think you are right. I am absolutely fine w/ having the node-js-sender on AGJS. It's been a) a fairly stable component (lholmquist++) and b) our APIs are mostly JSON payload to a well-known endpoint - so not much to 'plan' from a AGPUSH / UPS perspective ok, sounds good. I will start adding things over there -M On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Fink, Miles <mfink@email.unc.edu<mailto:mfink@email.unc.edu>> wrote: I'll see if I can’t get it in JIRA. Just to clarify, the issue I noticed regarding empty arrays was on the 0.7.x branch of Node Sender, so it may not be an issue in the latest branch. -Miles From: Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org<mailto:matzew@apache.org>> Reply-To: AeroGear Developer Mailing List <aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>> Date: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 at 4:51 AM To: AeroGear Developer Mailing List <aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>> Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS Node Sender client categories issue? Miles,Luke mind filing a JIRA issue for this ? On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui@redhat.com<mailto:lholmqui@redhat.com>> wrote: On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Fink, Miles <mfink@email.unc.edu<mailto:mfink@email.unc.edu>> wrote: Thanks Luke. Using 0.7.0 version worked. I will note a couple items: 0.8.x uses applicationId (note Id), .0.7.x uses applicationID Also, I was sending empty arrays for the settings.criteria that I wasn’t using (deviceType, alias) which then still sent the notification to all installations regardless of the categories I was sending. After I removed all the empty arrays from criteria and just sent the categories array it worked! thanks for that input. sounds like a Bug! Anyway, thanks for the support! Much appreciated! Cheers, Miles From: Luke Holmquist <lholmqui@redhat.com<mailto:lholmqui@redhat.com>> Reply-To: AeroGear Developer Mailing List <aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>> Date: Thursday, July 9, 2015 at 1:32 PM To: AeroGear Developer Mailing List <aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>> Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS Node Sender client categories issue? So i see you are using the 1.0.3 version of the UPS, could you try the 0.7.0 version of the node-sender and see if that works. The 0.8.x series is targeted for the 1.1.x UPS series which has had some message format changes On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui@redhat.com<mailto:lholmqui@redhat.com>> wrote: hey Miles, Thanks for using the UPS!! so i think what your seeing is probably similar to this issue, https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1459 The Dashboard uses the Java Client Sender, so something is going on with the node one then thanks for putting your versions you are using, that should help narrow down things -Luke On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Fink, Miles <mfink@email.unc.edu<mailto:mfink@email.unc.edu>> wrote: Hi, I’m just starting out with UPS (which is awesome btw!) and the Node.js sender client. One thing I’ve noticed is that a message sent from the dashboard with a particular category is sent to only those installations that have that category listed. This works great and is expected. I’m glad there is a way to target specific notification channels, etc. Sending a notification via the Node Sender client however appears to be sending to everyone’s installation regardless of the categories sent with the message. Here’s a pastie of what my node client call looks like: http://pastie.org/10282358 I’m using: Unifiedpush Node Sender version 0.8.0-beta1 UPS is the setup via the openshift cartridge, from https://cartreflect-claytondev.rhcloud.com/reflect?github=aerogear/opensh... Any pointers would be greatly appreciated. Very well could be me doing it wrong… ;-) Thanks, Miles _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev