Ahoy, let me give a more concrete example.
This is what I've been working since last week
http://cobblepot-abstractj.rhcloud.com/docs/guides/security/oauth2-guide/.
The credits to the team who worked hard into this documentation will be
added on the last section.
So for 3rd parties, we already had something build by the team. What I
did was just format and migrate to:
http://cobblepot-abstractj.rhcloud.com/docs/guides/security/oauth2-guide/...
What I have in mind per platform can be seen here:
-
http://cobblepot-abstractj.rhcloud.com/docs/guides/security/oauth2-guide/...
-
http://cobblepot-abstractj.rhcloud.com/docs/guides/security/oauth2-guide/...
Not sure if that answers your question, but if something is missing.
Feel free to add to AGSEC-200 with a full description. Also keep in mind
that I'm working on those sections.
On 2015-03-10, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Bruno Oliveira
<bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
That's nice. But I was more asking if we would/should just offer these
guides for 3rd parties like FB/Google instead of having actual code,
meaning some convenience implementations for FB/Google like we do on
iOS/Windows.
--
abstractj
PGP: 0x84DC9914