On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com>wrote:
The JS builds are able to ship "isolated".
On Android, we can stick to the current model, IMO
-M
++
Corinne
On Jul 23, 2013, at 7:35 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
Alright, as mentioned yesterday in the team meeting:
the push sdk will be modular, like the OTP-iOS
So, nothing here changes.
btw. Later this week we will see a version going to CocoaPods
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
>
> I also agree on keeping it, as it is
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org>wrote:
>
>> +1 brodular
>>
>> Douglas Campos wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:03:06AM +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>> >> [ ] Include the Push bits in the AeroGear-iOS lib
>> >> [ ] Keep the Push SDK separated
>> > +1 - the more modular the merrier :)
>> >
>>
>> --
>> abstractj
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev