On Wed 05 Mar 2014 10:58:45 AM EST, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com
<mailto:supittma@redhat.com>> wrote:
On Wed 05 Mar 2014 10:32:49 AM EST, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Daniel Passos
<daniel(a)passos.me <mailto:daniel@passos.me>
<mailto:daniel@passos.me <mailto:daniel@passos.me>>> wrote:
I'd like add push in lib name
aerogear-android-push (for core)
aerogear-android-push-gcm
aerogear-android-push-mqtt
I still think that mqtt is more messaging, instead of push :-)
Well right now it would be "push" because we don't support
bidirectional communication. MQTT is just the transport.
We SHOULD investigate messaging soon since GCM supports it.
and that's different from push (think APNs / SimplePush), which is
what we support on the UnifiedPush Server.
Right. mqtt and friends were just examples of things we had talked
about.
However messaging for the project may be something we look at one day.
doing messaging, via GCM, is fine but something different. There the
underlying technology (e.g. MQTT vs. GCM) is really just a transport,
like:
-messaging-gcm
-messaging-mqtt
-messaging-stomp
-M
-- Passos
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Matthias Wessendorf
<matzew(a)apache.org <mailto:matzew@apache.org>
<mailto:matzew@apache.org <mailto:matzew@apache.org>>> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Lucas Holmquist
<lholmqui(a)redhat.com <mailto:lholmqui@redhat.com>
<mailto:lholmqui@redhat.com <mailto:lholmqui@redhat.com>>> wrote:
On Mar 5, 2014, at 9:33 AM, Matthias Wessendorf
<matzew(a)apache.org <mailto:matzew@apache.org>
<mailto:matzew@apache.org <mailto:matzew@apache.org>>> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Summers Pittman
<supittma(a)redhat.com
<mailto:supittma@redhat.com> <mailto:supittma@redhat.com
<mailto:supittma@redhat.com>>> wrote:
Earlier in development (pre passos) making the
Android SDK into modules
was not a concern (in fact it was an
anti-concern).
Now, however, we have a much more complete
project
and it is time to
have that discussion.
Right now we have two BIG questions:
1) Do we want to break out interfaces and
implementation?
If we do this then we could reuse a lot of
code to
make a aerogear-java
as well.
2) How granular do we want our modules?
IE If we break out push into
aerogear-android-push
would that include
GCM, SimplePush, MQTT, etc in one package
or would it
look like
android-gcm
android-simplepush
android-mqtt
+1 to those names, and i'm sure you mean
aerogear-* :)
yep ;-)
aerogear-android-push-core,
aerogear-android-push-mqtt etc.
Thoughts?
--
Summers Pittman
>>Phone:404 941 4698
>>Java is my crack.
_________________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.__jboss.org
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>>
https://lists.jboss.org/__mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
<
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.__wordpress.com/
<
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/>
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/__mwessendorf
<
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf>
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_________________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.__jboss.org
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>>
https://lists.jboss.org/__mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
<
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev>
_________________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.__jboss.org
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>>
https://lists.jboss.org/__mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
<
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.__wordpress.com/
<
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/>
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/__mwessendorf
<
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf>
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_________________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.__jboss.org
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>>
https://lists.jboss.org/__mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
<
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev>
_________________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.__jboss.org
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>>
https://lists.jboss.org/__mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
<
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.__wordpress.com/
<
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/>
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/__mwessendorf
<
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf>
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_________________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/__mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
<
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev>
--
Summers Pittman
Phone:404 941 4698
Java is my crack.
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
--
Summers Pittman
>Phone:404 941 4698
>Java is my crack.