Re: [aerogear-dev] [UPS] What should the Top 3 Most Active Variants shows ?

On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Hum, after thinking and looking a bit I think it's easier and more clear > to show the "real" 3 most recent active variants like you mentioned, along > with the numbers of receivers for the last push messages (but the label > should be made more obvious to explain this number, working on that s well) > sounds good w/ me

-M > > > > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt; > wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt; >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> So the questions are, I think: >>>>> >>>>> 1) what does 'active' mean? >>>>> * total activity >>>>> * or recent activity >>>>> >>>>> Having [1] in mind, I *think* the three most recent active variants >>>>> makes sense >>>>> >>>>> 2) what number do we provide for that variant: >>>>> a) number of receivers/active tokens that received the last Push >>>>> message >>>>> b) total number of all receivers, in history >>>>> c) number of total push messages, per variant >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Here, I *think* that b) does not make sense, having [1] in mind. I >>>>> think presenting a) or c) as the number on that "three recent active" >>>>> variants is a nice info. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Ok , but imagine this we have 4 variants, A,B,C,D. >>>> They all sent the same messages within the same hour , starting with : >>>> A sends 5000 messages >>>> B sends 100 messages >>>> C sends 15 messages >>>> D sends 50 messages >>>> >>> >>> >>> I think messages == receivers ? (I doubt that one variant will send 5k >>> of push messages - I'd try to sue the company for that amount of spam on my >>> phone) >>> >> yeah receivers :) >> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> The top 3 recent active are B,C and D , it's a bit a pita A do not >>>> show up, >>>> >>> >>> >>> that's life! :) >>> >>> >>>> since it was really the more active. >>>> Shall we define active within a period (24 hours ? ) ? >>>> >>> >>> doesn't make that even more complex ? >>> >> Well, not that much I think since we are already going to introduce a >> new query based on dates. I will take a look. >> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Sebi >>>> >>>> >>>>> -Matthias >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-673 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> I decided to start a new thread after some discussions we had on a >>>>>> previous thread[1] >>>>>> >>>>>> Basically, we are talking about this part of the dashboard : >>>>>> >>>>>> [image: screenshot-1.png - Latest 25/Jul/14 8:20 AM - Sebastien >>>>>> Blanc] >>>>>> >>>>>> It appeared that is not really clear what we want to show there, as >>>>>> a side note, the current query behind this is not correct and should change >>>>>> whatever we decide. >>>>>> >>>>>> So, what can we show here : >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. Show the most (three) recent active variants (and their # of >>>>>> receivers) >>>>>> Active means here, the 3 latest variants that sent a Push Message. >>>>>> The term "receivers" can also be confusing , do we want to show : >>>>>> >>>>>> 1.a : The number of receivers/active tokens that received the last >>>>>> Push message (i.e : Push Message A sent to 10 people and Push >>>>>> Message B to 5 people, we show 5) ? >>>>>> 1.b : The total number of receivers/actives tokens of this variant >>>>>> (i.e : Push Message A sent to 10 people and Push Message B to 5 people, we >>>>>> show 15) ? >>>>>> 1.c : The total number of Push Messages sent (i.e : Push Message A >>>>>> sent to 10 people and Push Message B to 5 people, we show 2). ? >>>>>> >>>>>> 2. Show the most active variants (and their # of receivers) >>>>>> Almost same than 1. but here we look at all the variants even those >>>>>> without an recent activity. >>>>>> Here again 1.a/1.b or 1.c applies. >>>>>> >>>>>> The core question, IMO, is what would be an useful information for >>>>>> the user ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Sebi >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] >>>>>> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/2014-July/008548.html >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>>> >>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev