Based on this current UI mock-up:
I see most of the fields you added as "advanced" options.
By default, I, the newbie, have just added a variant, just deployed the app to my phone,
just hit "yes" to receive notifications, just seen the device token in the web
UI - so I just need to hit a single button to send a test message.
For your multi-field (app, variant, device, alias, category, etc) UI, can that be
"hidden" under Advanced Options? So that I, the newbie, only get a simple text
area to edit the default "Hello Push World" message?
On Feb 25, 2014, at 4:22 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Sebi
Great idea!
Would it be possible to have a dropdown box for all possible variants?
:) Sure, I had that in a previous version I worked on this morning, but for simplicity
for now I just choosed the "Free text" option for all the criterias. Later we
will make that nicer
++
Corinne
On 25 Feb 2014, at 10:06, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I started to work on a new "Compose Message" page. The idea is that you
can add criterias to your message , as you can see here on this screenshot :
>
> I've also deployed a live version but *DICSLAIMER* this is just UI / Mockup work
sending will not work for now :
http://newpush-sblanc.rhcloud.com => Select an App and
you will have a "Copomse Message" link on the next page.
>
> Feedback is welcome.
> Sebi
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Sounds good.
> Let me know if you need any help with the mockup designs. ;)
> Sure, I will ASAP submit a "raw" mockup on which you can work on.
> What I would like is a dedicated page for the "Compose Push Message"
feature.
>
> We wil have a criteria section to choose to who we want to send the message. I
really like for instance how Jira do that like here
http://postimg.org/image/5ur2j9wh5/
> In our case we could have the drop downs for : "Variants", "Device
Type", "Alias" and "Categories"
> And then below w will have a free text area to send a custom value.
>
>
>
> Hylke
>
>
>
> On 23/02/2014 12:08, Sebastien Blanc wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> over the weekend I spoke w/ a friend: His company is doing some mobile
(iOS/Android) apps which also support receiving push notifications.
>>
>> Two examples he told me. After receiving push notification:
>>
>> * One of their apps basically fetches the latest version of a CSV file, stored
on a public HTTP Server.
>>
>> * Another app is used to tell sales guys new brochure files (PDF) are available
on a protected resource of a webserver (which they _can_ than download from w/in the app,
if the like to)
>>
>> The company build a simple console (PHP) which allows them to send new push
messages, when ever their customers want to.
>>
>> I showed them our UnifiedPush Server and its usage via our AeroDoc example (iOS
/ backend). They really liked the UnifiedPush Server. Especially that it does store all
the device metadata.
>>
>> But since a lot of their mobile apps don't have a backend requirement, they
would still have to use their own console (which than connects to UPS) for submitting all
the push messages they want.
>>
>>
>>
>> This brings me to [AGPUSH-38] and I really think we should implement that
feature. Not only for sending test messages! If our UnifiedPush Server allows its users to
simple send push messages to all of their mobile apps, it would make the server even more
attractive.
>>
>> I regret a bit that I was against [AGPUSH-38] in the beginning, I guess
that's due to my Java enterprise background, where you typically find complex setups,
and server talk to servers :-(
>>
>> Anyways, now I really think that the UPS has to have such a 'send push'
facility inside of the Admin UI :-) I believe that we could reach way more potential users
with something like that
>> +9001 and I already started thinking about this for a while. I will try to
submit some mockups/POCs this week so we can discuss that and I have quickly a first
working version on master.
>>
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Matthias
>>
>>
>> [AGPUSH-38]
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-38
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev