Re: [aerogear-dev] [Aerogear Pipeline] Support for nested endpoints
Regarding on how we pass the resource, do we want to establish an
convention here about the leading "/" ?
i.e "/teams", should we omit the "/" and just pass "teams"
?
If we take a look a the current impl in JS for passing an id, we have the
convention of no leading "/" as this one is added implicitly by the library.
More generally, I will start a new thread about convention for passing
resources because I spotted some other cases where we are mixing stuff,
remember : Keeping It Simple by Don't Repeating Yourself with Convention
Over Configuration
Seb
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com>wrote:
+1 for approach #1
And since approach #1 seems quite popular the Gist has been updated with
the JS version of #1 https://gist.github.com/cvasilak/4a5f51b8d1ad9cc7f21b
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Daniel Bevenius <
daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for approach #1. Nice write up on this Christos, thanks for that!
>
>
> On 10 April 2013 18:32, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
>
>> yeah - same here, :) +1 on proposal #1
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
>>
>>> Approach #1 hands down
>>>
>>> --
>>> qmx
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 4.1 KB)