Re: [aerogear-dev] Differences between Firefox OS "native" Push lib and AeroGear's Push adapter

so after testing this thing out with encodeURIComponent, the delete does work, however, we need to "double up" the encode. this works: https://gist.github.com/lholmquist/10393357 this doesn't: https://gist.github.com/lholmquist/10393450 On Apr 7, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: On Apr 7, 2014, at 12:52 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: Ok, So as token, we use the endpointURL, and on client we perform the encodeURIComponent() function ? i think so( as suggested 2 months ago :) ) i just need to see how this will affect how we store stuff in LS. -Matthias On Monday, April 7, 2014, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > so i went back to look at what i had, > > > i don't think we need to get to complicated here, > > reading the spec stuff, and this example > > https://wiki.mozilla.org/WebAPI/SimplePush#Client_.28WebApp.29_code > > they show sending the pushEndpoint to the "App server", so i think we > could just use and keep it simple > > it is also recommended that the channelID is never exposed to the > application. > > > On Apr 1, 2014, at 3:34 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > i had something, now i forgot what it was, need to go back and check > On Apr 1, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; > wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt;wrote: > > still exploring > > > :-) any recent thoughts on 'encodeURIComponent()' ? > > > > On Feb 13, 2014, at 3:39 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt;wrote: > > i might have a couple thoughts, but i need to try some things out first > > > Any update on that or does the solution proposed by Matzew (using encodeURIComponent() > ) could be enough ? > > > On Feb 12, 2014, at 3:53 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: > > Ok, > I've been doing some tests by using the PushEndpoint as device token. For > registration it works but I just faced an issue by trying to unregister > because the URL for the DELETE looks like : > > > https://judconpush-sblanc.rhcloud.com/rest/registry/device/https://update... > > And the REST endpoint get a bit crazy by the extra "/" present in the > endpoint URL. Therefore, I think we must just use the last URL fragment as > deviceToken. > > > Ok answering to myself ;) That won't work neither since if we do that UPS > won't have the compllete push endpoint URL. > So how do we deal with that ? > > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt;wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Sebastien Blanc > > -- Sent from Gmail Mobile _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev