On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 03:14:33PM -0500, Kris Borchers wrote:
In our team meeting today, I brought up the question of whether or
not the JavaScript clients for both SimplePush and Unified Push should live in folders
under AeroGear.js or in their own repos. I would like to open this up to suggestions from
the team. Please vote below.
SimplePush Currently, this lives under AeroGear.js at
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/tree/Notifier/src/simple-push
IMO, this makes sense since it also has a hard dependency on Notifier
which lives here
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/tree/Notifier/src/notifier I
would vote this remain where it is. Please vote whether or not this
should remain in the AeroGear.js repo.
keep as is
Unified Push Currently, this lives under AeroGear.js at
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/tree/Notifier/src/unified-push
IMO, this is not necessary since it could be used independently from
the rest of AeroGear. I would vote that this move to a separate repo.
This would also mean that the client object's name would change since
it is currently namespaced under AeroGear as
AeroGear.UnifiedPushClient. I would suggest it be renamed to
AGUnifiedPushClient and be added to a repo named
aerogear/unified-push-js. Please vote for whether or not this should
move and if it should, an object name and repo name.
Why can't we keep it
namespaced?
+1 to split
-1 to changing the namespace.
--
qmx