Re: [aerogear-dev] New GH Repos and their names?
Ok... :)
not sure the repos really need the aerogear- (talking about JUST the repo
name), but that's not really that important...
for consistency, why not ?
aerogear-simplepush-server
aerogear-push-ios-demo
aerogear-push-registration-ios
aerogear-unified-push
aerogear-unified-push-java-client
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
yeah, these names do make sense!
+1
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
> So the repo names so far:
>
> aerogear-push-ios-demo
> aerogear-simplepush-server
> push-registration-ios
> unified-push
> unified-push-java-client
>
> I'd like to do another quick run on it, this time asking about
> consistency ;)
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> qmx
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 4.1 KB)