I am also +1 for this so just waiting for any objections. We should discuss this at the
meeting so we can get any necessary updates and testing done early in the week.
On Feb 22, 2013, at 3:27 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
If you need pagination, on TODO app we can just add AeroGear
Controller and start the tests on the next week?
I'm +1 for it. Decoupling ag-sec from ag-controller is an old request for users that
don't want the whole "stack"
Wdyt?
--
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile
On Friday, February 22, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Kris Borchers wrote:
> Bruno,
>
> The bigger question here is upgrading TODO to use controller. If we want to demo
paging in the TODO app clients, we'll either need to add controller or implement some
sort of paging system in the TODO app itself. What are your thoughts on this?
>
> On Feb 22, 2013, at 3:17 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
>
>> HI Jay, I already did it and I've been pushing it to my fork.
>>
>> I successfully deployed the TODO app with ag-security and the latest bits from
PicketLink. Now I'm double checking, to make sure that I do not mess up anything.
>>
>> I hope to have something stable on Monday.
>>
>>
>> --
>> "The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
>> -
>> @abstractj
>> -
>> Volenti Nihil Difficile
>> On Friday, February 22, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Jay Balunas wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I've mentioned this to one or two of you but I wanted to have a wider
discussion. We need a showcase application for 1.0.0.Final, something we can point people
to and show off at presentations We don't have time to create a whole new example.
So...
>>>
>>> I propose we review the existing TODO app and estimate the work required to
get it updated to support paging, and the latest security updates. We should also discuss
if it makes sense to move this to use the controller for the backend, or even have one
with and one without the controller.
>>>
>>> Lets discuss this at next weeks team meeting because one way or another I
think we need a complete demo ;-)
>>>
>>> -Jay
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev