On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
Hi Matthias, I think we're in a good shape. We have 3 PR to be
reviewed:
-
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/pull/154
I would vote to postpone it for further releases
I just added a label (1.0.1) on that PR. since an external contributor sent
it, I'd like to keep it open
-
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/pull/250
It seems like ready to go
-
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/pull/253
Need some feedback
Regarding the Keycloak integration, I reasssigned AGPUSH-568 to myself,
but let me know if you want to be in charge of it.
no, perfect that way !
On 2014-06-30, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Hello,
>
> while waiting for my flight back home I was looking over the open PRs and
> added a few comments:
> *
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/pull/250
> *
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/pull/249
> *
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/pull/244
> *
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/pull/243
>
>
> Besides those, there are three open tickets, which I'd like to see fixed
> for the 0.11:
>
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH/fixforversion/12321883/?selectedTa...
>
> Any thoughts?
> -Matthias
>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
>
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
abstractj
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf