I like the idea, so +1.
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:15:05 -0500
Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com> wrote:
As AeroGear.js gets larger and more complex, it makes sense to
revisit our
build strategy as well as our dependency management strategy since that
affects the build.
I was thinking, and after discussing with Luke I believe he agrees, that we
should investigate the use of AMD (Asynchronous Module Definition). What this
provides for us is:
Better modularization between the pieces of code in AeroGear.js
Better dependency management by specifically defining those dependencies in
each module A better base for our custom build process
I think all of those reasons point to the need for this implementation. That
being said, it doesn't come without a cost. We would need to reorganize the
repo and modify each file to make it a proper AMD module. This will take time
but I think it is time well spent.
I would be glad to hear if anyone has any thoughts or concerns around this.