Let's see how the UPS integration goes, before we have too much KC
integration fields, ok ?
Once we got that done, I guess we have a good experience on proper
integration
-M
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
Yeah, sounds reasonable to me.
On Tuesday, May 6, 2014, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Good work!
>
> I wonder... It might be good to use the same integration for our OAuth2
> server side demo in [1]
> Here I used a KC server with realm.json configuration. Would it be
> possible/worth it to replace all the configuration with plain Java?
>
> ++
> Corinne.
> [1]
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-integration-tests-server/pull/4
>
> On 06 May 2014, at 11:49, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello folks!
> >
> > Bill Burk was helping on the Keycloak front and besides fixing related
> items on the Keycloak server, he also created an example that we can use as
> a template for the actual integration. See [1]
> >
> > In the past, Bruno and I did integrate w/ an external Keycloak server
> (see [2]), and we did include the keycloak.json file (See [3]). Thanks to
> Bill's work on Keycloak, the 'protected app' no longer needs that, see
[4].
> > Also there is no more the need to customize the Keycloak Rest
> Application (Stian and I did look into that as well).
> >
> >
> > Good news: This means the UPS can stay as it is -> no need to change
> internals (e.g. the 'bundle all in one WAR file' did force us to change our
> '/rest' URLs, as Keycloak uses them, see [5]).
> >
> > Inside of our 'modular' Keycloak branch (see [2] again), we can apply
> the work from Bill:
> > * our current 'server' module will use a listener similar to [4]
> > * create a "ups-auth" module similar to [6]
> >
> > On the 'ups-auth module' there is one area where we need to have some
> future improvement:
> > * testrealm.json -> needs to be in Java code, due to the URL being
> hard-coded in there (we need to resolve the URL of the host, running the
> bits). But, IMO for now that should be good enough.
> >
> > Bruno did offer to help out on the Keycloak integration, so that I can
> go back to the analytics and mertrics feature. Thanks abstractj!! <3
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Matthias
> >
> > [1]
>
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/tree/master/project-integrations/aer...
> > [2]
>
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/keycloak-mod...
> > [3]
>
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/keycloak-mod...
> > [4]
>
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/blob/master/project-integrations/aer...
> > [5]
>
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/keycloak-emb...
> > [6]
>
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/tree/master/project-integrations/aer...
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile