On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com> wrote:
If we figure out something else, or change our mind, we can always
move/create some JIRAs.
Overall these items you created here are looking good. However I think the
server needs a bit more definition, e.g. what type of adapters (e.g.
Couch-Adapter, Hibernate-Adapter), assuming we agreed on this architecture,
instead of embedding w/in an application (e.g. on-top of JPA/Hibernate)
Now we need to figure out things like versions, release dates,
project
specific JIRAs, etc.
Me PERSONALLY I think that
*
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1405 and
*
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1409
sounds like a good starting point
leave us in a great place for a 0.1.0 release. It will have enough
stuff done that we can say "yes this a product" but isn't so feature
rich that we get bogged down in minutia.
WDYT?
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf