same here. I think perhaps we "just" protect master?
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
I feel 50/50 about it, sometimes we have to rebase and fix some mess
in
the Git tree.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>
https://github.com/blog/2051-protected-branches-and-required-status-checks
>
> I think this would be good for us to implement
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
--
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev