Re: [aerogear-dev] Call for arms -> Unified Push 1.0.0.Beta2 release bundle

Barring some bitrot on the docs, UPS on EAP works in Windows 8. I even know how to replace the Unix curl commands with native Windows commands. (On Windows 8 with Powershell 4) On 8/11/2014 9:26 AM, Burr Sutter wrote: On Aug 11, 2014, at 7:46 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Daniel Bevenius < daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Tested aerogear-push-hellworld/cordova and found this issue: > * https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-push-helloworld/pull/41 > > Other than that I was able to run both the Android and iOS applications > and receive push notifications. > > I did not have ant installed which generated an error which was pretty > clear, but perhaps we should add something about this requirement unless it > is mentioned elsewhere. > oh, right - I think it does not hurt to have 'Ant' in the requirements section (install is also easy :-) -> brew install ant ) Cordova and Android will mostly be developed on Windows machines. I assue the non-command-line user will be fine just using JBDS - many Windows-based developers never see a command line (DOS prompt). And for those Windows-based devs who are comfortable with an command line - we can specify what version of Ant they should have in their PATH and they should know what the PATH is. > > > > On 11 August 2014 12:24, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com&gt; > wrote: > >> Tested aerogear-push/helloworld/andorid and was able to follow the docs >> to setup everything and try out the application and receiving notifications >> by using Genymotion (thanks to Erik and Passos for helping me set that up). >> >> >> >> >> >> On 11 August 2014 09:31, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> Tested aerogear-push-helloworld/ios and found the following minor >>> issues: >>> * *https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-925 >>> <https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-925>* "iOS helloworld example >>> contains out dated information regarding sending push messages." >>> * *https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/pull/350 >>> <https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/pull/350>* "Minor spelling >>> corrections/suggestions" >>> Other than those I was able to follow the docs from scratch and run the >>> app and successfully received push notifications. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10 August 2014 13:48, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Matthias Wessendorf < >>>> matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi team, >>>>> >>>>> now that we have votes for the UPS and the java-sender (see [1] and >>>>> [2]), I'd like to start testing the release bundle. >>>>> >>>>> As mentioned on IRC, the nominees for the testing, are: >>>>> * sblanc, cvasilak, dbevenius, lholmquist, lfryc and abstractj >>>>> >>>>> Besides testing the UPS and sender staging repos, please test our >>>>> quickstarts as well: >>>>> 1) >>>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-push-helloworld/releases/latest (1.0.0.Beta2 >>>>> tag) >>>>> 2) https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-push-quickstarts >>>>> >>>>> Regarding 2), please use the master branch, for now. There will be >>>>> a .Beta2 tag as well, once the open PRs are merged (and reviewed) >>>>> >>>> >>>> Most of the PRs have been merged and reviewed. Those that are open >>>> require some additional work and it's perfectly fine to get them in for >>>> 1.0.0.Final. >>>> Therefore here is the Beta2 release/tag >>>> >>>> >>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-push-quickstarts/releases/tag/1.0.0.... >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Last but not least, please 'test' (review) the documentation as >>>>> well, like our guide on the UnifiedPush Server: >>>>> http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide/ >>>>> >>>>> BTW. there is more doc on the new 'UPS doc center' :-) >>>>> http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hopefully, by Wednesday we have an awesome 1.0.0.Beta2 and shortly >>>>> after that we can go to CODE_FREEZE for the 1.0.0.Final >>>>> >>>>> Any thoughts ? >>>>> >>>>> -Matthias >>>>> >>>>> PS: besides the nominated folks, others are welcome to test the >>>>> things as well :) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -Matthias >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/2014-August/008710.html >>>>> [2] >>>>> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/2014-August/008706.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>>> >>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>> >>> >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing listaerogear-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev