Matthias Wessendorf wrote
Ah, I think the delegate is the issue; because it lacks the FCM topic
code
from Android SDK
we had no problems with aerogear-unifiedpush-server-1.2.0-alpha.1
and not when naming the variants with
aerogear-unifiedpush-server-1.1.3.Final
but I would give it a try:
how would a correct json request look like?
couldn't find something matching at
https://aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-unifiedpush-rest-1.0.x/registry/...
Mischa
--
View this message in context:
http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-broken-push-notifi...
Sent from the aerogear-dev mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.