Re: [aerogear-dev] Website restyle Was: Help needed setting ag.org for testing

Does, would, could, should the push admin console have the same sort of styling to make a distinct tie in with AeroGear?

On Jun 10, 2013, at 1:14 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: wow, that looks really nice! I DO like the changes! +1 :-) Also looking forward to a "responsive" version :-)) On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Jay Balunas <jbalunas(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Hi Hylke, > > I really like the updates you have made! I can certainly see where the > responsive design could really make this great on different size screens! > > I'll be really curious what others think as well. > > -Jay > > On Jun 9, 2013, at 7:22 PM, Hylke Bons wrote: > > Hey, > > Thanks for the replies. I finally got the website to run locally using > rvm. > I had some issues sending emails and didn't even realise this message > actually arrived. > > Jay asked me to fix some issues with the website before upcoming traffic > flows from the upcoming conferences. I did the things he requested, but > couldn't help myself redoing more of the style... > > Here are some screenshots: > > > https://raw.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/new_style_frontpage.png > https://raw.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/new_style_page.png > > It's all pretty plain still, but we can use this as a base to work from > the coming weeks and iterate on the design. My main goal was to get > something together that is easier to read and parse. > > The pull request is here: > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/pull/85 > > Some things to note: > > - It's not responsive yet (I'll do this as soon as possible) > - Not all pages look perfect yet. This is mainly due to inconsistencies > in the markdown used. > - I've used the adjusted feature descriptions on the frontpage that we > discussed here earlier. > > I hope you like it. (and apologies if I'm moving too fast :) > > Thanks, > > Hylke > > > > > On 07/06/2013 19:17, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > For Ruby 1.9.x installation, I used "rvm". Not sure if that is "best", > but worked :-) > > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org#building >> >> On Jun 7, 2013, at 10:12 AM, Hylke Bons <hbons(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >> Anyone who can help me out? >> >> Hylke >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing listaerogear-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev