+1 on keeping UT with the lib
If Laurel was the library, the unit tests would be Hardy
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Kris Borchers
<kris(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mar 1, 2013, at 12:38 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 28/02/2013, at 20:07, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> aerogear-android-tests: This will house all of the Aerogear tests for
>>>> Android.
>>>
>>> You mean moving all the tests? Can't this be only for integration
tests, and the unit tests stay on the aerogear-android project?
>>
>> I'd also prefer to have the unit tests for each of the libs
>> (aerogear-android + aerogear-android-support) being in there.
>
> I can see one reason to have the unit tests in a separate project. I
assume both aerogear-android and aerogear-android-support would have pretty
much identical tests since their functionality should
> be the same, right? It would be a pain to have to maintain multiple sets
of the same tests across projects.
>>
Not sure about the details, BUT... you misread.
Unit tests belong to the library. I am -1000 on having a 'unit test'
only broject.
Integration tests are different, they _should_ be separated
-M
>> Only integration tests should be a totally independent project,
>> consuming the other libs (aerogear-android + aerogear-android-support)
>> and having tests against em.
>>
>> -M
>>
>>
>>>
>>> -- qmx
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev