+1
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to release the next version of UPS (0.10.0), we covered a lot of
items since our last release ([1]).
However, there are some open PRs ([2] and [3]) around the user-management
work that Sebi did, with help of Bruno. As we have been discussing on
different threads (e.g. [4]), we started looking at Keycloak and it also
offers the facility for user management as well.
I'd like to get the Keycloak integration as the primary goal for the next
release, beides fixes and other potential features (e.g. around security).
That said, but IMO this kind makes the PRs around user-management
redundant. Especially since in [2] we filed a bunch of new JIRAs to
cover/fix issues and weak design etc.
I'd really like to skip the user-mangement PR (see [2]). We might want to
keep the branch - just in case, but I'd really like to see this not
landing, especially as we are already looking towards keycloak integration.
Any thoughts ?
-Matthias
[1]
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH/fixforversion/12321876
[2]
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/pull/118
[3]
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/pull/123
[4]
http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-Keycloak-on-AeroGe...
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev