Re: [aerogear-dev] Push "all inclusive" demo

I'd go for first option :) Do we have the service to retrieve all leads not assigned to sale agents as you suggested earlier?

similar, isn't it?

On 21 June 2013 09:02, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > I like it but for now there is no service to retrieve leads by > SaleAgents, so we have 2 options : > > - Implement the service (Doh!) > - Store the accepted leads on the device > > Seb > > > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> So I see it with 2 tabs: >> one "in progress leads" with all the leads accepted by the agent logged >> (default screen) >> another with "new leads" with all pushed leads unassigned >> >> a bubble notification appear on "new leads" tab icon once a lead has >> been pushed by the admin >> >> the sale agent can then accept this lead which then move to the "in >> progress tab" >> >> If another agent accept the lead, the lead should disappear from the >> "new leads" >> >> are you ok with the UI workflow? >> >> >> On 20 June 2013 23:33, Sébastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> Show all leads that have no sale agent id set >>> >>> Envoyé de mon iPhone >>> >>> Le Jun 20, 2013 à 22:21, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; a >>> écrit : >>> >>> Sebi, >>> >>> When a sale agent logs in he should see a list of leads with criteria >>> like all lead belonging to him or leads made in his area or just all leads? >>> as the admin user does selective push (with geolocation criteria or >>> other) i wonder if it makes sense to display all leads at initial login. >>> >>> On the other hand if the sale agent got only its lead there is no point >>> to broadcast to others when a lead is accepted. >>> >>> wdyt? >>> >>> >>> On 16 June 2013 11:56, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me&gt; wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:33:12AM +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >>>>> > JIRA => https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1261 >>>>> >>>>> Please assign those to me next time - spent a good time trying to find >>>>> it :P >>>>> >>>> >>>> Oh, sorry :) I thought I did that. Added (and reopened) for one more >>>> repo request: >>>> >>>> - aerogear-push-quickstart-web >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers! >>>> Matthias >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> qmx >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev