On 02 Feb 2015, at 11:45, Matthias Wessendorf
<matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
Hi,
on our homepage ([1]) we have some handwritten docs that cover the roadmap for parts of
our components. These roadmaps contain a duplication of content that is available in JIRA.
Since this content is handwritten, it's often not as up-to-date as it should be. Here
are a few examples:
*
https://aerogear.org/docs/planning/roadmaps/AeroGeariOS/
*
https://aerogear.org/docs/planning/roadmaps/AeroGearAndroid/
*
https://aerogear.org/docs/planning/roadmaps/AeroGearCordova/
Basically the contain incorrect dates and duplicate the list of effected JIRAs. But I
wonder why we even do have these handwritten docs?
JIRA itself has a roadmap overview, which looks nice and clean:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGIOS/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jir...
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGDROID/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.j...
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGCORDOVA/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira...
Since we track our issues, versions and releases in JIRA the above roadmaps comes for
free. Now, when we change a release date in JIRA, using the above links as our roadmaps
means we don't need to update the handwritten doc:-)
Any thoughts?
-Matthias
[1]
https://aerogear.org/docs/planning/
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev