Re: [aerogear-dev] parent pom?

+9001 On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me&gt; wrote: > While reviewing summers' PR I've found myself doing that tedious work of > fixing license headers again - what do y'all think part of our default > tools (like maven-license-plugin) on an aerogear parent pom (which > inherits from jboss parent pom, of course) > > Thoughts? > > -- > qmx > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev