On Feb 4, 2014, at 2:44 AM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Cool, will try it out later today!
On 3 February 2014 22:50, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
Did a (temporary?) upload of the binary:
https://github.com/matzew/simplepush-cli/raw/dist/bin/simple-push
-M
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 8:18 PM, JR Conlin <jrconlin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Ah, makes perfect sense. I'll go back to lurking.
On 2014/2/3 11:03 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Yep, works w/ UnifiedPush, and we use thst for testing as well
>
>
> However we need/have java libs fir sending, hence turning that into less verbose CLIs
is just a few lines of code :-)
>
> On Monday, February 3, 2014, JR Conlin <jrconlin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> One other note:
>
> I don't know if this would work for UnifiedPush, but for testing remote REST
calls, I tend to use curl
>
>
http://curl.haxx.se/
>
> It's available for nearly every platform known.
>
> It's pretty easy to use on the command line, so sending a PUT would be:
>
> curl -X PUT -d "version=123"
http://push.services.mozilla.org/longStringOfCrap
>
> where -X specifies the method to use
> -d specifies the "data" to send in the request
>
> Curl is amazingly powerful once you dig into it and can save a lot of time. Just
figured I should share the knowledge.
>
> On 2014/2/3 10:36 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Monday, February 3, 2014, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> looks pretty neat,
>>
>> i think we can also adapt the node.js versions to also be "installable"
for CLI use, similar to how you can also use plugman/cordova cli's api and not just
on the command line
>>
>>
>> I had brew in mind for this; will look into this later this week
>>
>>
>> On Feb 3, 2014, at 1:18 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> while thinking about potential refactorings, and moving some of the java
'sender' code into subprojects I played w/ the ideas of also offering CLI for:
>>>
>>> * SimplePush
>>> * UnifiedPush
>>>
>>> An early (hacky) version of a SimplePush CLI is located here:
>>>
>>>
https://github.com/matzew/simplepush-cli
>>>
>>> The neat thing - I think - you can ignore the nasty version string, in that
case the current timestamp is used. The CLI has been tested w/ our Quickstart on
SimplePush ([1])
>>>
>>> The actual code for the "SimplePushClient.java" file could be than
also be reused inside of the UnifiedPush Server - my current code here is very much the
code from the UnifiedPush Server (except here I am using OKHttp)
>>>
>>> thoughts?
>>>
>>> -Matthias
>>>
>>> [1]
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-simplepush-quickstart
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev