Re: [aerogear-dev] [SimplePush] Sockjs support

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: > I think we can do both with priority to 1. > As mentioned in my email about SPS and Vertx your server implementation > can easily be used as library because you isolated all the netty code into > a package. > That would be my vote as well. * Get the SockJS "wrapper" up and running => that way, I think, we will have fast results, also on the JS side of the things * Work on Netty-based SockJS codec * use our own, once the codec is ready (which COULD :) mean the wrapper was just a temporary solution -Matthias > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Daniel Bevenius < > daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've been working on adding support for Sockjs to the SimplePush server. >> There is a project named socksj-netty [1] which is an external project >> written for Netty 3.x. >> We are using Netty 4 and there have been quite a few changes between >> these two versions. I've spent some time already trying to upgrade to Netty >> 4 but I have not been completely successful. Testing has been hard as there >> is only an external test suite [2], so it's been a matter of getting the >> code base to compile and trying to change as little as possible to work >> with Netty 4. >> Perhaps due to my lack of understanding the sockjs-protocol I've found >> this to be somewhat of guess work. There are also parts of the >> sockjs-protocol that I'm not sure are implemented, like heartbeats. >> >> I'm now considering rewriting the sockjs-netty and use the "Netty 4 >> way". This will take some time which was not planned for. >> Another option that Matthias brought up was to instead use Vert.x. It >> was discussed previously what we should base our implementation on and I >> got the impression that we "should" stick with Netty. I've been very happy >> with Netty and would like to continue with it, but this might be that I'm >> more familiar with it compared to Vert.x. >> >> So I'd like to hear what people think: >> 1. Implement Netty Sockjs >> 2. Switch to Vert.x instead >> >> thanks, >> >> /Dan >> >> [1] https://github.com/cgbystrom/sockjs-netty >> [2] https://github.com/sockjs/sockjs-protocol >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev