+1 to add aerogear- on repo name
-1 to aerogear-push-demo-ios ? :-)
I Like to see aerogear-push-ios-* ;)
Is it for server?
wdyt => aerogear-unified-push-server?
If we have client, we have server, right?
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
aerogear-push-demo-ios ? :-)
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
Ok... :)
not sure the repos really need the aerogear- (talking about JUST the repo
name), but that's not really that important...
for consistency, why not ?
aerogear-simplepush-server
aerogear-push-ios-demo
aerogear-push-registration-ios
aerogear-unified-push
aerogear-unified-push-java-client
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>wrote:
yeah, these names do make sense!
+1
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
So the repo names so far:
aerogear-push-ios-demo
aerogear-simplepush-server
push-registration-ios
unified-push
unified-push-java-client
I'd like to do another quick run on it, this time asking about
consistency ;)
Thoughts?
--
qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: <
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf>