Re: [aerogear-dev] [aerogear-controller] Handling SecurityProvider Exceptions/Events

Ah, that makes it simpler, just forwarding to a view. Not sure where I got the idea of returning a response...maybe I did suffer some brain damage after all ;) which do not belong to aerogear-controller, concepts like unauthorized, forbidden and etc, that is my concern. Good point! Thanks for your gist and I'll use that, and test it out with the controller and demo. Den 2 nov 2012 18.04, "Bruno Oliveira" <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; skrev: Hi my friend! First at all, great gist! And answering your question: * Should it really be AeroGear-Controller that determines if a response should be returned to the caller, or if it should forward to a view? IMO it should be forward to a view. Few comments about that gist. If we bring SecurityResult to aerogear-controller we're bringing concepts which do not belong to aerogear-controller, concepts like unauthorized, forbidden and etc, that is my concern. My suggestion is a little bit simple https://gist.github.com/c635dc2e5e82ba666ca3, the provider chooses how to implement that and uses http status responses by convention. Wdyt? Makes sense? -- "The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato - @abstractj - Vo... On Friday, November 2, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Daniel Bevenius wrote: daniel.bevenius@gmail... bruno(a)abstractj.org)&gt; wrot... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _____________... __________________________________________...