Re: [aerogear-dev] Imporovements to Push Server draft (Was: Some questions about the Unified Push Server...)

On 29/05/2013 16:42, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: wow - I like the graphic. A few more "corrections" 1) Developers can also add "SimplePush variant" 2) How about "Mobile application (aka MobileVariantInstance), running on the device, register themselves using a token" ? Sure, I'll fix that.

3) I think JBoss AS backend server makes sense here - however, it can be bloody PHP app as well :) True, I think this is a minor detail and it's better to mention that as an annotation to the image? Something like "This graphic shows the interactions between Push Applications and the Unified Push Server using a JBoss backend as an example.".

4) Possible to add a "cloud" to represent the different push networks (for iOS(APNs), for Android (GCM) and SimplePush) ? I don't draw clouds. ;)

Are you refering to the word "PushNetworks"? I think it does make sense to have an extra step in the graphic there, but don't think it should be a cloud. :)

Thanks, Hylke Makes sense ? > > (it may make sense to have a dedicated design repo in the Github > organisation?) > > Let me know what you think and I'll create a pull request if it gets the > go ahead. > yeah, let's have a PR (perhaps with an updated version of the image) ? -M > > Thanks, > > Hylke > > > > On 29/05/2013 10:17, Hylke Bons wrote: > > Thanks! Makes sense. :) > > Hylke > > On 29/05/2013 06:49, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > Hello Hylke, > > 1) Admin user: This should be 'Developer', mentioned in the spec document > you are referring to (looks like a typo) > 2) UnifiedPush Server: Yes, that gray thing is basically the UP Server > 3) yes, backend does not need to run on the same machine. > --> The UP-server could be deployed in the cloud and backends (hosted > somewhere else), can access it. That's why the UP-server has HTTP > interfaces. So even a PHP application could send messages to it. > > -Matthias > > > > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> ...overview graphic found on >> http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-server-push/. >> I've annoted my questions in an image as they're worth a thousand words. >> :) >> >> Thanks, >> >> Hylke >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing listaerogear-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing listaerogear-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing listaerogear-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev