Re: [aerogear-dev] AeroGear parent 0.2.0 staged

Hi Bruno, I think I owe you a couple of hundreds of beers... I did not include all the necessary tags that, before the decision of not injecting aerogear-parent inside the BOMs, were directly inherited from the parent. My fault. And yes, I would keep the versions aligned, I would aerogear-misc require Java 6 as the minimum JDK. Thanks a lot. Bruno Oliveira wrote > Good morning my friends, > > After banging my head against the wall with all the verbosity from > Maven I managed to stage AeroGear parent and AeroGear Misc. > > Here comes the respective repositories: > > - > http://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/jboss_releases_sta... > - > http://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/jboss_releases_sta... > > What went wrong? > > Maven is a beast an if you don't add the respective tags it can't be > released on > Nexus(https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-parent/commits/master). > > Also, aerogear-misc requires Java 7 as the minimum JDK and > aerogear-parent requires Java 6. It sounds inconsistent to me, should we > change? > > If you have any idea about how to improve the goddamn verbosity, I would > thank you for the whole eternity. > > -- > > abstractj > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev@.jboss > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- View this message in context: http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-AeroGear-parent-0-... Sent from the aerogear-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev