It's not really about the Twitter handle making sense, it's about it not
causing confusion. :)
Hylke
On 20/02/2014 22:17, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
I still can't see what the real value added on it. Everyone knows
that
there's a team behind it, so I can't see why "_team", also do we plan
to create handles for "AeroGearPush", "AeroGearSecurity"...if yes,
that makes sense. And "_project", well we know, it's a project, the
"s" on @aerogears always gave to me the sense of a bunch of people
behind this to make it happen.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
<matzew(a)apache.org <mailto:matzew@apache.org>> wrote:
Actually, @aerogear_project makes sense (see @netty_project)
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Matthias Wessendorf
<matzew(a)apache.org <mailto:matzew@apache.org>> wrote:
@__aerogear or @_aerogear ?
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me
<mailto:qmx@qmx.me>> wrote:
**If** we're really forced to change, I'd go with
@aerogear_project
--
qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
--
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev