On 09/18/2013 09:37 AM, Karel Piwko wrote:
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:31:36 -0400
Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On 09/17/2013 11:17 AM, Karel Piwko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I went once again through
>>
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/2013-June/002901.html - which
>> says that Sender API should be fire&forget. It feels more like "maybe
>> fire"&forget, for instance it does not say that your credentials were
wrong
>> - or it says, you need parse logs to get that information.
>>
>> If I think about Android, iOS, JS solutions to communicate with
>> UnifiedPush we provide - Pipes - they always provide a callback to be
>> executed on success/failure. Could we add callback to Sender API? Or should
>> not Aerogear rather have something like Pipes abstraction for Java
>> developers instead of pretty dumb Sender API?
>>
>> Thoughts?
> In a bit of crazy land perhaps the client could keep a web socket or BSD
> Socket open to the server which would let it get callbacks about things
> that happen further down the tree.
Isn't this land called vert.x?
Maybe I misunderstood. I thought it was wanting
to get information from
the push server about the status of messages being sent not the response
of the commands to the push server itself.
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Karel
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev