Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS: Console - Visibility issues

Good idea Sebastien! That is a good placement. I'll test it and see if we need a line or something to mark a separation between them and the network info. On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > I would vote to have them along with the other variant details that are > already shown (like google's project number etc ...) > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Andres Galante <agalante(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Matthias and Lukas, >>> >>> During the user research time I've learn that there are almost none use >>> case where the user uses this information stand alone. The user would just >>> copy and paste the code snippet. >>> >> >> well, that does not always work (e.g. sligthly different structure of >> code). >> Even our own Android HelloWorld Demo is not able to use the snippets and >> paste them in (due to different code structure - which is good). >> >> Having them visible give a bit more appreciation to these IDs (or call >> em API keys), so it's easy to get the desired info quickly >> >> >> >> >>> >>> We use it a lot because we test it and set it up a bunch of times UPS. >>> We already have the code set up and we end up knowing where to look for the >>> data. Luke bring this same issue to me during Summit. >>> >>> Let me think of a good way to highlight that information to make the >>> expert user life easier. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Lukáš Fryč <lukas(a)fryc.eu&gt; wrote: >>> >>>> Basically it is something that we "agreed on" (or rather didn't catch) >>>> during mockup reviews and that never changed from that time. >>>> >>>> @Andres: did it have some reason to hide the details? >>>> >>>> I'm all for exposing it more visibly. >>>> >>>> st 24. 6. 2015 v 17:21 odesílatel Matthias Wessendorf < >>>> matzew(a)apache.org&gt; napsal: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> on our old design the PushApplicationID/MasterSecret was very good to >>>>> notice: >>>>> >>>>> https://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide//img/applications_var... >>>>> >>>>> Now it's a bit more hidden (one has to click on the "Sender API" tab >>>>> of the Application). >>>>> >>>>> Similar w/ the VariantID/Secret pair, IMO it is also a bit hidden, >>>>> since this is only visible in the source snippets for the variant. >>>>> >>>>> They used to be a bit more present: >>>>> >>>>> https://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide//img/applications_var... >>>>> >>>>> Since I find that suboptimal, I am wondering if that's done for a >>>>> good reason, or if something (in a future version?) should be changed ? >>>>> >>>>> -M >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>>> >>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >