On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com> wrote:
In our team meeting today, I brought up the question of whether or
not the
JavaScript clients for both SimplePush and Unified Push should live in
folders under AeroGear.js or in their own repos. I would like to open this
up to suggestions from the team. Please vote below.
SimplePush
Currently, this lives under AeroGear.js at
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/tree/Notifier/src/simple-push
IMO, this makes sense since it also has a hard dependency on Notifier
which lives here
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/tree/Notifier/src/notifier
I would vote this remain where it is. Please vote whether or not this
should remain in the AeroGear.js repo.
I *think* it would be good to have a separated repo for it.
So, folks that want to use the SimplePush, and only SimplePush, could just
add the "AG-SimplePush.js" to their project
(it could still have a dependency against Notifier, right?)
Unified Push
Currently, this lives under AeroGear.js at
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/tree/Notifier/src/unified-push
IMO, this is not necessary since it could be used independently from the
rest of AeroGear. I would vote that this move to a separate repo. This
would also mean that the client object's name would change since it is
currently namespaced under AeroGear as AeroGear.UnifiedPushClient. I would
suggest it be renamed to AGUnifiedPushClient and be added to a repo named
aerogear/unified-push-js. Please vote for whether or not this should move
and if it should, an object name and repo name.
+1 for moving to its own repo
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf