Re: [aerogear-dev] [Unified Push Server] Roles structure & password management

On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: Not closely related indeed. Could be another role 'tester' if we want to implement the test feature. Make more sense since you define 'user' as 'normal developer'. I suck at names - But yeah 'super developer' is worse :-) Why not stick with dev and user (and admin) ?

-M ++ Corinne On Oct 17, 2013, at 3:44 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > any corp. org. may want some with just read-only access; > The project lead is allowed to update the keys etc, but all the /normal/ developers can just see the IDs/secrets (so that they can use it in their server apps). > > I guess that's not really (at least for me) closely related to a 'test via admin ui' feature > > -M > > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Not sure about the role: user. > > What will be the use case for this one? > One use case, I see is if the 'user' is a tester. If we had the feature to send push notification test via admin UI (as we discussed in [1] and [2]). > > ++ > Corinne > [1] http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-Push-Server-Admin-... > [2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-38 > > On Oct 17, 2013, at 3:09 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > > On Oct 15, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > > >> So for the next Unified Push Release (0.9) it would be nice if we could have some decent User Management, so I'm bumping this thread again. > >> Some existing pointer : > >> > >> - this thread :) > >> - https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-351 > >> - https://gist.github.com/sebastienblanc/6547605 > >> > >> First point to define is : > >> - What roles do we want ? And what can these Roles do ? > > > > Admin - Can do all things including creating other users > > Developer - can create apps and such. no access to the user management UI > > User - read only - not sure if this one is needed > > Yes, not sure also but why not ? Could be useful for a monitoring app/RHQ plugin that just want to retrieve the list of active pushapps ... > > > > > > +1 - I like these three different roles, including their rights > > > > > > > > > >> - How can these Roles be created (granted ...) > >> - Design > > > > I think we are still waiting on Hylke for this? not sure > > > >> > >> Seb > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Apostolos Emmanouilidis <aemmanou(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> Following the discussion on GitHub [1], here are some points to be > >> discussed about the user management flow: > >> > >> - Does it make sense to add a role select field (admin, developer) on > >> the enrollment page? > >> > >> hrm, and (perhaps later) a section where to define the roles ? I think it's a good point, but not sure we need all this 'now' :-) > >> > >> - Should we add an additional password field (password confirmation) on > >> the enrollment page? > >> > >> yeah, would be nice > >> > >> - I think that the current logged in user shouldn't be available for > >> deletion > >> > >> yep, I agree > >> > >> [1]: > >> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server-admin-ui/pull/6 > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 10:15 +0200, Sebastien Blanc wrote: > >> > A Jira has been created https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-351 > >> > And draft structure has been created > >> > here https://gist.github.com/sebastienblanc/6547605 that can be used > >> > as base for the Pull Request. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me&gt; wrote: > >> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:39:28AM -0300, Bruno Oliveira > >> > wrote: > >> > > Would be nice to have a 8 hands document on it > >> > > >> > > >> > who's going to start the pull request on it? it's SPECTIME! > >> > > >> > -- > >> > qmx > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > aerogear-dev mailing list > >> > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > aerogear-dev mailing list > >> > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> aerogear-dev mailing list > >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Matthias Wessendorf > >> > >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> aerogear-dev mailing list > >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> aerogear-dev mailing list > >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > _______________________________________________ > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev