No, it just sends "null". But that does not seem to be an issue for the
first app :/
On 25 January 2017 at 15:56, Matthias Wessendorf <mwessend(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
and the tool that intercepts the requests also sends back some
meaning
full reponse ?
like described here:
https://firebase.google.com/docs/cloud-messaging/send-
message#http_response
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo <
jgallaso(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Yes, the proxy is up and the -Dcustom.aerogear.fcm.push.host is set, the
> notifications are actually being sent.
>
> On 25 January 2017 at 15:44, Matthias Wessendorf <mwessend(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> endpoints for thje /fcm/send mock are setup ?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo <
>> jgallaso(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo <jgallaso(a)redhat.com>
>>> Date: 25 January 2017 at 13:00
>>> Subject: Mysterious warning when sending push
>>> To: AeroGear Developer Mailing List <aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have some phenomenon here. I have created 4 variants with 100 fake
>>> tokens and sending 1 push through the mock FCM server. What I got is 400
>>> (401 to be exact) receivers so it seems to work OK.
>>>
>>> These are the 4 variants (the order is important):
>>>
>>>
>>> However ONLY on 2nd to 4nd variant I got this warning:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The first variant in the list is not getting the error. I created them
>>> in order (0 - 3) so this does not matter because the 0 (second in the list)
>>> is receiving the warning but the 1 (first in the list) is not.
>>>
>>> Look what happens if I delete the first variant in the list and send
>>> another notification:
>>>
>>>
>>> (Now the first in the list is variant 0, the former 2nd in the list)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This is no longer receiving the warning!
>>>
>>>
>>> Here is the log from the console:
>>>
https://gist.github.com/josemigallas/69db6619a46bafafc9ae028a29b343f7
>>>
>>>
>>> So what do you think? Bug? It does not seem to be related with the fact
>>> that I am using the FCM proxy... or does it? Maybe I'm missing something
>>> obvious.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo*
>>> Associate QE at Mobile Team, *Red Hat*
>>> <
https://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/mobile/application-platform>
>>> +34 618 488 633 <+34%20618%2048%2086%2033>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo*
>>> Associate QE at Mobile Team, *Red Hat*
>>> <
https://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/mobile/application-platform>
>>> +34 618 488 633 <+34%20618%2048%2086%2033>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Project lead
AeroGear.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo*
> Associate QE at Mobile Team, *Red Hat*
> <
https://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/mobile/application-platform>
> +34 618 488 633 <+34%20618%2048%2086%2033>
>
--
Project lead
AeroGear.org