Re: [aerogear-dev] Admin and Developer roles for UPS

The interface design is not a big deal. Would be nice to add some >> filtering to the search: >> >> - search by owner >> - search by variant >> - search by app name >> > > regarding the search and filtering, I do see value in it, but - for > timing reasons, let's please do that only once the other stuff is really > in, and works. > > I don't expect a gazillion of PushApps on one server instance, so > pagination of a few pages, sorted by "username" should be good enough > +1 , it's just a matter of adding "ORDER BY developer" and I think we can reuse our pagination component from the installation page. But indeed, for the next releases adding some filtering will be nice.

> > >> >> >> > >> > That's just one initial thought. Once we agree on this overall >> feature, I >> > think we will nail the details of the 'how' in the relevant JIRA >> subtasks >> > of AGPUSH-697. >> > However I fully agree that we need to apply some tweaks to the >> existing UI, >> > so that the owner name is visible when the 'admin' is looking at the >> > "application overview" page, like in the screenshot. >> >> Subtasks already created: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-697 >> >> >> > >> > >> > > >> > > That's why I think the mininum for the UPS admin interface must be >> > > defined, right >> > > now, before start the whole implementation. What would you expect to >> see >> > > when you query the whole database? >> > > >> > >> > I thought about adding 'pagination' on the "application overview" page, >> > similar like we do on the installations. >> > >> > -Matthias >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >From my understanding, Keycloak will just manage these users and >> > > unless >> > > > > something has changed, we provide the fine grained authorization >> model >> > > on >> > > > > UPS. Like >> > > > > we did in the past. >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > yeah, the users live in Keycloak - we somehow differentiate on the >> > > > role/user if we do a "select all" or just those for the specific >> user >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Am I correct? >> > > > > >> > > > > [1] - >> > > http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/2014-May/001851.html >> > > > > >> > > > > On 2014-10-08, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >> > > > > > Hi, >> > > > > > >> > > > > > as of today, we have a single user (admin), to revisit that we >> have >> > > > > > AGPUSH-697 (see [1]). >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Based on changes over the months (e.g new UI and being based on >> > > > > Keycloak), >> > > > > > I have updated our old spec/gist: >> > > > > > https://gist.github.com/matzew/ed0055000a8347488a37 >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Greetings, >> > > > > > Matthias >> > > > > > >> > > > > > [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-697 >> > > > > > >> > > > > > -- >> > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf >> > > > > > >> > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> > > > > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > > > > >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ >> > > > > > aerogear-dev mailing list >> > > > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> > > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > >> > > > > abstractj >> > > > > PGP: 0x84DC9914 >> > > > > _______________________________________________ >> > > > > aerogear-dev mailing list >> > > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Matthias Wessendorf >> > > > >> > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> > > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > > >> > > > _______________________________________________ >> > > > aerogear-dev mailing list >> > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > >> > > abstractj >> > > PGP: 0x84DC9914 >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > aerogear-dev mailing list >> > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Matthias Wessendorf >> > >> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> > aerogear-dev mailing list >> > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> >> >> -- >> >> abstractj >> PGP: 0x84DC9914 >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev