On 04/01/2014 09:22 AM, Miguel Lemos wrote:
?! I can do it worse: uninstall the app because it drains the
battery.
Push messages don't drain the battery that much. They all come in over
the GCM socket which is refresh every 15 minutes or so.
Keeping an open socket doesn't drain the battery that badly. IN a
(contrived) experiment I had a socket which sent a packet every 5
minutes to the device. Over the course of 5 hours the app didn't even
register on things which had drained the battery.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com
<mailto:supittma@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 03/31/2014 02:03 PM, Miiguel Lemos wrote:
> Using the GCM for push notifications has a very important
advantage: it minimizes the battery consumption, since it reduces
the processor overload, it's not needed to open a socket to check
the server on a regular basis, etc. In my opinion this a critical
matter, minimizing the probability of the user turning the
notifications off.
On Android you can't turn notifications off in the same way as iOS.
>
>
> Enviado do meu iPad
>
> No dia 31/03/2014, às 18:51, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org
<mailto:bruno@abstractj.org>> escreveu:
>
>> I would vote for A
>>
>> --
>> abstractj
>>
>> On March 31, 2014 at 10:59:01 AM, Summers Pittman
(supittma(a)redhat.com <mailto:supittma@redhat.com>) wrote:
>>>> Y'all,
>>> So there has been some concerns with the complexity of the build
>>> especially where including the Google GCM (push) libraries
>>> are
>>> concerned. Additionally there have been some requests for a
>>> separate
>>> "push" module which won't need the full aerogear android
library.
>>>
>>> The full modularization of the library along with several other
>>> improvements is scheduled for the "2.0" epic.
>>>
>>> So my question is a) Should we make a 2.0 which is only the
>>> modularization sooner and iterate on that a few times before
>>> we include
>>> our improvements in a 3.0 or b) Should we create a "fork"
project
>>> which
>>> is only a push module? This new project will get merged back into
>>> the
>>> main project when we have our complete modularizations.
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Summers Pittman
>>Phone:404 941 4698
>>Java is my crack.
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Summers Pittman
>Phone:404 941 4698
>Java is my crack.