On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 5:01 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
well... the use of components makes it easy - and for versions we
could
even do something like, for instance in AGJS
node-1.2.0
store-0.7.0
i think for the JS library, we would only version components that lived in
there own repo. the node sender makes sense here. but store(and other
components of the main lib) probably wouldn't get this type of granularity,
and at this point, i don't think it makes sense to split them apart
etc
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Lukáš Fryč <lukas.fryc(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I know there already is strong agreement, but my $0.02:
>
> I'm not convinced about AGJS and connection with server-side libraries.
>
>
> I feel like AGIOS, AGDROID, AGCORDOVA, AGJS are trackers for client-side
> libs,
>
> AGPUSH, AGSYNC, are trackes for server-side technologies,
>
>
> consider this use case: if we build eventually a new server-side Swift
> node-sender library, we won't track it under AGIOS because Swift comes from
> iOS land.
>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> word up👍
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, July 16, 2015, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 Sounds good
>>>
>>> On 15 July 2015 at 22:52, Daniel Passos <dpassos(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Bruno Oliveira
<bruno(a)abstractj.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 makes more sense
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Luke Holmquist
<lholmqui(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> we've decided that it would probably be a good idea to move
JIRA's
>>>>>> related to the node-sender to the AG-JS JIRA instead of having
them on the
>>>>>> AGUSH JIRA.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i think this makes a bit more sense since this a javascript
>>>>>> component.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've started to move open JIRA's over. i think i'll
probably just
>>>>>> leave the existing JIRA's where they are, unless someone
feels strongly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've also started to create some "component"
versions similar to the
>>>>>> other projects.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the main JS lib will still be just numbers, like 2.3.0, and for
the
>>>>>> node-sender we will now have node-sender-0.8.0, for example
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Luke
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> "The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
>>>>> -
>>>>> @abstractj
>>>>> -
>>>>> Volenti Nihil Difficile
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> -- Passos
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev