+1 on JAX-RS and the renaming of the repo
On 9 September 2013 18:17, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 05:38:35PM +0200, Sebastien Blanc wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org>
wrote:
>
> > ATM yes, why? Because we make use of entities from the IDM. But there
> > are many solutions to this problem.
> >
> > - Implement your own User on the server (only for ag-demo aka the good
> > ol' AeroGearUser)
> > - Change the way how AG controller parse these parameters
> > - Send those credentials on HTTP header
> > - Get rid off AG controller and implement it on JAX-RS (I would vote
for
> > this one)
> >
> +1 but in this case the repo itself doesn't make much sense since is
> called aerogear-controller-demo :) or rename it like "aerogear-sandbox"
to
> show OTP, paging etc ... ?
+1 to JAX-RS and +1 to renaming the repo.
--
qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev