Re: [aerogear-dev] parent pom?

+1 - abstractj On Jun 29, 2013, 8:15 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > Ha! > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me&gt; wrote: >> To finish this task I'd like to create two repositories on our GitHub >> >>> organization: >> >> >>> - aerogear-parent[1] (contains the parent pom) >> >>> - aerogear-misc[2] (contains license header templates + code formatting >> >>> rules) >> >> >>> Here follows a proper example[3] of the optimizations we can have by >> >>> using this parent pom. >> >> >>> Any objections? > > Not at all. I like it. Gave some feedback/PRs on your repos > > >> >> >>> Thanks! >> >> >>> [1]:https://github.com/qmx/aerogear-parent >> >>> [2]:https://github.com/qmx/aerogear-misc >> >>> [3]:https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-android/pull/76 >> >> >>> -- >> >>> qmx >> _______________________________________________ >> >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev