Re: [aerogear-dev] [JS Doc] feedback on the new JS-Doc

One more... > * http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-js/AeroGear.html > - add/remove/ajax: These are internal helpers/utilities, right? Not > sure if that should be exposed... wouldn't it be more logical if the add/remove were documented on the different modules ? http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-js/AeroGear.DataManager.html I think users would benefit if the add/remove was mentioned on each module, instead of on the 'global' AeroGear.html file. I think the current way maybe a bit confusing... > > I think the 'isArray' is a bit different => I can see that some > END-USER finds 'AeroGear.isArray(argument)' pretty useful! > (compared to something like AeroGear.ajax(...), where you already need > to pass in an AeroGear object) > > * On the different adapters: > Regarding their privileged functions => Do we want to expose/document > the privileged methods? Or 'just' the public methods? > > > > Fixed a little typo: > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/commit/3ed416af824d2b398a7db8b276... > > Added a PR for two very simple fixes on the JS lib: > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/pull/6 > > > Greetings, > Matthias > > > [1] http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-js/ > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf