On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons(a)redhat.com> wrote:
You are right that it may be a bit long for replies.
"@AGTeam" or "@AGProject" could work too (if they weren't already
taken
but something amongst those line :).
not sure if AGTeam/Project is really 'cool'
Hylke
On 30/01/2014 11:29, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> "@AeroGears" can cause confusion about what the project name really is.
>
All the JUGs I presented at, and some conferences call the project
already "AeroGears", due to the tiwtter handle :-)
>
> Options to fix:
> - Ask the owner of @AeroGear if he or she want to give up the handle
>
are we also offering 50k ? :)
> - Change the handle to "@AeroGearTeam" or "@AeroGearProject", or
> something else
>
I think the 'concern' was that the name is too long, but on the other
hand, there is some sort of confusion w/ our actual name :-0
If I had to pick one out of those that you suggested it would be
'AeroGearTeam', that's exactly just three chars longer than the current :)
-M
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Hylke
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing
listaerogear-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf