Re: [aerogear-dev] parent pom?

+1 On Jun 29, 2013, at 7:11, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; wrote: > +1 > > - > abstractj > > On Jun 29, 2013, 8:15 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > >> Ha! >> >> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me&gt; wrote: >> To finish this task I'd like to create two repositories on our GitHub >> organization: >> >> - aerogear-parent[1] (contains the parent pom) >> - aerogear-misc[2] (contains license header templates + code formatting >> rules) >> >> Here follows a proper example[3] of the optimizations we can have by >> using this parent pom. >> >> Any objections? >> >> Not at all. I like it. Gave some feedback/PRs on your repos >> >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> [1]:https://github.com/qmx/aerogear-parent >> [2]:https://github.com/qmx/aerogear-misc >> [3]:https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-android/pull/76 >> >> -- >> qmx >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev