Awesome.
i remember writing a blog post on using the Android variant for chrome,
but i don't think i ever created an example for it. And i think it was
only for packaged apps at that time. So this is really nice.
I've actually been looking at Web Push a little lately and i noticed that
to send a payload, there are some extra bits of info, that are attached to
the subscription object that would probably need to be stored on the UPS
somehow. I believe this is the same for FF too.
I wonder if we should start looking at a "WebPush" variant. If only Safari
would follow suit.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:45 AM, Oleg Matskiv <omatskiv(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hello Idel,
Great demo !
Thank you for sharing.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 2:25 AM, Idel Pivnitskiy <
idel.pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've created an example, which shows how Chrome Push API could work with
> AeroGear Unified Push. It works without any changes to the UPS code base!
>
> Here is a sample app:
>
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js-cookbook/pull/13
> And here is a demo:
https://youtu.be/o6FdbJm-47Y
>
> Hope you will enjoy! :)
>
> Best regards,
> Idel Pivnitskiy
> --
> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <
https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <
https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
Oleg Matskiv
Associate Quality Engineer
Red Hat Mobile Application Platform
omatskiv(a)redhat.com
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev