I'm fine with this. We might want to think about offering our own build
plugin in a future release
On Apr 30, 2016 7:23 AM, "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
Or, we skip the plugin, and continue to rely on the sender_id /
project_number, like now ?
I think I am a bit sceptical if this plugin makes us go a route we perhaps
don't want ?
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
> How is the regerence impl. (gcm-playground) solving this?
>
>
> On Monday, 25 April 2016, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> I am currently working on setting up support for consuming the
>> google-services.json file for our AeroGear Android Push. I can parse the
>> file to extract the push values from it at runtime if the file is in the
>> assets folder; however, the Google services plugin expects this to be in
>> the project flavor root and thus outside of the classpath.
>>
>> What do you guys think? Ideally we wouldn't be dependent on Google's
>> plugin and would put this file in assets. However if you use Google's
>> services above and beyond push then we will either a) need to duplicate the
>> file or b) intelligently detect if the plugin was used to build the project
>> and consume the file as appropriate.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Summers
>>
>
>
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev